The quality difference between the two is very apparent. There is a mix of WaveNet and regular voices. They list them here on their reference page. Coverage: Google has 32 languages and 187 total voices.Ideally, I want to Copy + Paste the sample text to see if it’s worth the investment on the coverage and quality aspects. The demo space is the closest thing to having an interface to sample the voices, which is what I recommend for sampling purposes. Ease of Use: This is where the harshest criticism lies in our review for both Google and Microsoft, when compared to the user-friendly interface from Amazon.The demo should not be used for production purposes but it does show you the basics of how the audio sounds and what voices are available. Unless you know how to code or have someone who does, it’s off-limits to the casual user. This is offered as a developer’s tool rather than a streamlined user-facing platform. When we talk about the back end of TTS options offered by Google Text to Speech, it’s all “back-end.” Users need an API key, an authenticated service user, some tokens, permissions, and a bit of code to get started. Note, however, that research came out in 2016. They are a little slower to make their products available for commercial use, but they do have a selection of WaveNet voices that use their neural text to speech research. Google has undoubtedly invested a significant amount of talent and published the most cutting-edge research on making the most natural-sounding neural text to speech (NTTS). TTS Options offered by Google Text to Speech Your rating on quality will directly correlate to the original goals you outlined. But in some cases, such as French, you may have up to 10 options between all 3 providers with multiple genders and accents.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |