The type of display LCD, LED, CRT, projected, etc. However, this is normally always done when we print.Ĥ) Things just look different when you are looking at display which radiates light rather than looking at a printed sheet which reflects light. This means that at times a line that looks reasonably heavy on screen could be nearly invisible when you print.ģ) For performance reasons we don't use anti-aliasing to make the on screen display of lines look smoother. You can attempt to get the scaling more accurate in the control panel.Ģ) The DPI of your printer will almost certainly be different than your display DPI. I'm typing this on a Dell M3800 which Windows defaulted to a 200% scaling or 192 DPI, but the display is actually closer to 240 DPI. However, diplays at close to 96 DPI frequently vary between something less than 96 to 120 or 130 DPI. Historically on Windows the screen DPI has been normally assumed to be 96. You have the following issues.ġ) The real screen DPI and what the computer tells Chief is the screen DPI are almost always different. The main thing is to make sure you are always using the same scale everywhere.Īs far as a view for showing things on screen as they would print. The line weight scaling can also come into play. I wish documentation was better as that would help when looking for solutions when, in fact, they are available. There are so many options within CA, it is difficult to learn the implications of all as well as staying abreast, but that I think is inherent with all CAD programs. I am unfamiliar with some of the solutions presented here and intend to experiment with them. and Dimensions scaling would still be an issue I am guessing. (Now someone tell me we can already do that) Line wt. The only possible solution, in my feeble mind, would be if we could set zoom levels at a specific percentage, it might be easier to find that sweet spot that works for each user. pdf's is unwieldy when initially establishing details etc. pdf's is no guarantee one will not be surprised by the actual document, and, looking at. I have experimented with view levels (obtained by buttons and scrolling) that give me a pretty goo approximation however, line wt./dimensions, as others have indicated, are still a problem. Again, it seems to me there are too many variables to do that very precisely. I am told (but have never verified) that some CAD programs have tried to address this by providing a "view" that purports to be actual print size. I realize, given all the possible variables for each user, it has to be a difficult situation. Thank you all, and glad to see so many approaches to this problem. I'm sure I'm missing something, or not thinking about things correctly. Further, in layout, enabling/disabling Show Line Weights DOESN'T affect the auto-scaling of line styles. I only get the "correct" output if I DON'T enable Layout Line Scaling, but then I lose the benefits of Layout Line Scaling. Why don't they display the same? Sheet Setup is 1/4:12, layout box is 1/4:12. When I sent to layout at 1/4:12 with Use Layout Line Scaling I get this: In plan, I enable Show Line Weights, which displays my new line style RELATIVE to the other line styles: I create a new line style to show a sediment fence. Here is an illustration of why I'm frustrated with CA's paradigm: If my Drawing Sheet Setup is set to 1/4:12, then I want my line styles to display at this print scale (relative to all the other geometry), regardless of the screen's zoom level. Coming from an AutoCAD background, it's always been annoying to me that CA auto-scales dimensions, labels, and line styles according to the screen zoom level.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |